The Internet has made amazing things possible, like freeing the Jena 6, electing President Obama, even creating ColorOfChange. None of it could have happened without an “open” Internet: one where Internet service providers are not allowed to interfere with what is seen and by whom.

Now, Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon — the most powerful broadband providers — are trying to fundamentally change the way the Internet works. They’re seeking to make even bigger profits by acting as gatekeepers over what you can see and do online. If they succeed, the Internet would be more like radio and television: a few major corporations would control which voices are heard most easily, and it would be much harder for grassroots groups, individuals, and small businesses to compete with large corporations and well-funded special interests.

The FCC wants to do the right thing and keep the Internet open, but the big providers have been attacking their efforts, with help from Black leaders who have financial ties to the industry. And a court ruling yesterday just made the FCC’s job even tougher¹. If the FCC is to preserve an open Internet, they will have to boldly assert their authority and press even harder. It’s why they need to hear directly from everyday people, especially from Black folks, about the importance of an open Internet, now.

Can you join us in sending a message to the Federal Communications Commission supporting their effort to preserve an open Internet? It takes only a moment:

http://www.colorofchange.org/opennet/?id=1829-173305

The FCC is working to create rules that would protect “net neutrality,” the principle that protects an open and free Internet and which has guided the Internet’s operation since it began. It guarantees that information you put online is treated the same as anyone else’s information in terms of its basic ability to travel across the Internet. Your own personal website or blog can compete on equal footing with the biggest companies. It’s the reason the Internet is so diverse — and so powerful. Anyone with a good idea can find their audience online, whether or not there’s money to promote the idea or money to be made from it.

For Black folks, this is crucial. For the first time in history we can communicate with a global audience — for entertainment, education, or political organizing — without prohibitive costs, or mediation by gatekeepers in government or industry. That’s how ColorOfChange became successful: because of the low cost of starting up online, we could start small and grow without spending a lot of money. The strength of our ideas, not the size of our budget, determined our success. In television, radio and print, this can’t happen, because access is determined by big media corporations seeking to turn a profit.

AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon are spending millions of dollars lobbying to create a new system where they can charge large fees to speed up some data while leaving those who can’t afford to pay in the slow lane.² Such a system could end the Internet as we know it — giving wealthier voices on the Internet a much bigger megaphone than poorer voices, and stunting the Internet’s amazing equalizing potential.

Buying the support of Black organizations?

President Obama strongly supports net neutrality, and so do most members of the FCC. With so much at stake for Black communities, you would expect Black leaders and civic organizations to line up in support of an open Internet.

But instead, a group of Black civic organizations is challenging the adoption of net neutrality rules. Some of the groups are nothing more than front groups for the phone and cable companies. Others, however, are major civil rights groups — and all of them have significant financial ties to the nation’s biggest Internet service providers.

For example, AT&T donated half a million dollars last year to the NAACP and led a drive to raise $5 million more,³ and boasts of donating nearly $3 million over the last ten years to a number of Black-led organizations.⁴ Verizon, meanwhile, recently gave The National Urban League and the National Council of La Raza a $2.2 million grant.⁵ Comcast is one of the National Urban League’s “national partners” (Comcast Executive Vice President David Cohen now sits on the NUL’s Board of Trustees),⁶ and the NUL’s 2008 annual report notes that Comcast donated over $1 million that year.⁷ Many of these groups have now filed letters with the FCC opposing or cautioning against net neutrality,^8,9,10,11 and the Internet service providers are using the groups’ support to promote their agenda in Washington.^12,13

The main argument put forth by these groups is that net neutrality rules could limit minority access to the Internet and widen the digital divide. They say that unless we allow Internet service providers to make bigger profits by acting as gatekeepers online, they won’t expand Internet access in under-served communities. In other words, if Comcast — whose broadband Internet business was recently earning 80 percent profit margins ¹⁴ — can increase its profits under a system without net neutrality, then it will all of a sudden invest in expanding Internet access in our communities.

?This argument has been debunked^{15, 16} — it doesn’t make any sense from a business or economic perspective, and it doesn’t reflect history. Expanding access to high speed Internet is an extremely important goal, and we are fully in support of it. But allowing the phone and cable companies to make more money by acting as toll-takers on the Internet has nothing to do with reaching that goal. Businesses invest where they can maximize their profits, period. Internet service providers are already making huge profits,¹⁷ and if they believed that investing in low-income communities made good business sense, they would already be doing it. The idea that making even more money is suddenly going to make them care about our communities is ridiculous.

?When we’ve asked civil rights groups to back up their arguments against net neutrality, not a single one has been able to explain how they make any sense, without appealing to discredited, industry-funded studies.¹⁸ And no one can offer any evidence for the claim that protecting net neutrality will hurt efforts to expand Internet access.

?Some of these civil rights groups are quick to say that they don’t really oppose net neutrality, they only intend to raise questions or concerns they deem important. But the “concerns” raised by these groups sound so similar to talking points from the Internet service providers that both the FCC and the news media¹⁹ have interpreted them as against net neutrality. And these organizations have done little or nothing to clarify the record.

We don’t enjoy being in opposition to organizations like the NAACP, the Urban League, and the National Council of La Raza, organizations that have a history of doing great work that benefits our communities. But in this case, we don’t have a choice. The digital freedoms that are at stake are a 21st century civil rights issue.

We’ve privately contacted each of the above organizations, and we’ve publicly called for them to explain their positions, twice.^20,21 In each case, we’ve gotten nowhere.^*

Now it’s up to you

The FCC wants to do the right thing and implement net neutrality rules. FCC commissioners know, as we do, that the anti-net neutrality arguments coming from civil rights groups are bogus. But they don’t want to appear to be on the wrong side of Black interests.²²

We need to demonstrate that there’s support among Black folks and our allies for protecting an open Internet. Please join us in telling the FCC that we support net neutrality.

You can add your voice here:

http://www.colorofchange.org/opennet/?id=1829-173305

Thanks and Peace,

– James, Dani, William, Gabriel, Milton, Micah and the rest of the ColorOfChange.org team
April 7th, 2010

Help support our work. ColorOfChange.org is powered by YOU — your energy and dollars. We take no money from lobbyists or large corporations that don’t share our values, and our tiny staff ensures your contributions go a long way. You can contribute here:

http://act.colorofchange.org/go/5?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=5

____________________________

* We reached out to National Council of La Raza through a partner twice. We reached out directly and through a partner to the National Urban League. We did not get a response from either group. We had several conversations with senior leadership at the NAACP, who explained that they wanted to be “neutral” on net neutrality. However, the NAACP has signed on to two letters warning the FCC about adopting net neutrality rules, and several NAACP chapters and state conferences have sent letters to the FCC that carry the industry message even more blatantly (see refs 8,10, and 11). The only public statement regarding the NAACP’s “neutral” stance was a “tweet” on February 8th, after they were already under pressure, that stated: “A note to our friends in the blogosphere: The NAACP is NEUTRAL on net neutrality.” The tweet was followed by no formal announcement, and nothing has been put into the public record to counter any of the anti-net neutrality filings or letters. We were in conversation with the NAACP for more than two months. We were told that the NAACP wanted to set the record straight, and were told of the concrete steps they planned to take. None were ever taken and eventually our attempts to follow-up went unanswered.

References:

1. “The Courts Can’t Take Away Our Internet,” Save the Internet, 4-06-2010
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/190?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=7

2. “Threats to an Open Internet,” Save the Internet
www.savetheinternet.com/threats-open-internet

3. “NAACP Near Fund-Raising Goal with AT&T Campaign Leadership,” AT&T, 7-16-2009
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/171?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=9

4.”AT&T Launches 28 Days Campaign During Black History Month to Encourage, Inspire and Empower African Americans,” AT&T, 2-1-2010
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/172?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=11

5. “VERIZON FOUNDATION INVESTS $2.2 MILLION IN PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA AND NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE TO CREATE AFTER-SCHOOL EDUCATION PROGRAM USING THINKFINITY.ORG,” National Council of La Raza, 10-7-2008
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/173?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=13

6. “National Urban League and Comcast Announce Comprehensive Partnership Aimed at Improving Communities”, Comcast, 11-15-2007
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/174?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=15

7. “National Urban League 2008 Annual Report,” National Urban League, Retrieved 4-5-2010
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/175?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=17

8. Letter to the FCC signed by 20 Civil Rights Groups, 10-19-2009
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/176?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=19

9. FCC Filing signed by 16 Civil Rights Groups, 1-14-2010
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/177?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=21

10. Letter to the FCC signed by 23 Civil Rights Groups, 1-14-2010
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/191?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=23

11. Letters from NAACP local units to FCC opposing net neutrality
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/192?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=25

12. Email from US Internet Industry which uses the positions of civil rights groups to justify opposition to network neutrality, 12-3-2009
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/178?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=27

13. “AT&T Asks Employees To Oppose Net Neutrality,” Consumerist, 10-20-2009
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/179?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=29

14. “When Is the Cable ‘Buy’ Set to Come?” Wall Street Journal, 4-3-2008
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/180?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=31

15. “Why Consumers Demand Internet Freedom,” Free Press, 5-2006
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/181?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=33

16. “Finding the Bottom Line: The Truth About Network Neutrality & Investment,” Free Press, 10-2009
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/182?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=35

17. “AT&T’s Earnings Rise 26%, Driven by Wireless,” New York Times, 1-29-2010
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/183?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=37

18. “The ‘American Consumer Institute’ Doesn’t actually represent consumers…” Broadband Reports, 8-22-2006
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/184?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=39

19. “Minority and Civil Rights Groups Slam Net Neutrality,” Big Government, 1-25-2010
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/185?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=41

20. “Why Are Some Civil Rights Groups on the Wrong Side of Net Neutrality?” The Huffington Post, 1-28-2010
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/189?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=43

21. “Push-polling net neutrality,” The Huffington Post, 2-10-2010
http://act.colorofchange.org/go/187?akid=1422.789983.kIJ-6B&t=45

22. Ibid.

A month ago, the federal government promised it would pay more than $1 billion by the end of March to thousands of black farmers who complained of discrimination by the Department of Agriculture.

But Congress left on its spring recess without appropriating money to make the payments.

And that leaves the farmers waiting for justice — yet again.

Read more

The Sharpeville Massacre is remembered annually on 21 March - Human Rights Day. In order to pay tribute to those who lost their lives on this day, it is essential that we have an understanding of the context in which this event occurred. The year 1960 was a fateful year period for South Africa, and one that was to be inherent steeped in racial conflict, as foreseen in Harold Macmillian’s “winds of change” speech.

Read more via South African History Online.

WASHINGTON (AP) — First lady Michelle Obama on Tuesday reflected on her own family’s rise from slavery to the White House as she helped to unveil a statue of abolitionist Sojourner Truth — the first black woman to be so honored at the Capitol.

read more | digg story

The so-called “war on drugs” has created a national disaster: 1 in 15 Black adults in America are behind bars.¹ It’s not because we commit more crime but largely because of unfair sentencing rules that treat 5 grams of crack cocaine–the kind found in poor Black communities–the same as 500 grams of powder cocaine², which is the kind found in White and wealthier communities.

These sentencing laws are destroying communities across the country and have done almost nothing to reduce the level of drug use and crime.

We now have an opportunity to end this disaster once and for all. A bill is moving through Congress right now that would end the sentencing disparity.³ It’s critical that members of Congress see support from everyday folks. Join us in asking our representatives in the House and Senate to push for its passage, and please ask your friends and family to do the same. It only takes a moment:

http://colorofchange.org/crack/?id=1829-173305

At every step in the criminal justice system, Black people are at a disadvantage — we are more likely to be arrested, charged, and convicted, but less likely to have access to good legal representation, and get out of prison on parole.⁴ While there’s no denying that the presence of crack has a hugely negative impact in Black communities across the country, it’s clear that the overly harsh crack sentencing laws have done more to feed the broken system than improve our communities.

You have to be convicted of moving roughly $75,000 worth of cocaine to trigger a 5-year sentence.⁵ For crack? About $500 worth.⁶ These laws punish the lowest-level dealers, while providing a loophole that helps those running the trade escape harsh sentences.

Recently, attention has turned to these ill-conceived policies as prisons burst at the seams with non-violent drug offenders. The U.S. Sentencing Commission, which provides sentencing guidelines for judges, has petitioned Congress numerous times to change the sentencing laws.⁷

Last year, we reached out to you when Senator Joe Biden– one of the original architects of the disparity– introduced a bill that would have finally eliminated it and ended the mandatory minimum for crack possession, while increasing funding for drug treatment programs and providing additional resources for going after major cocaine kingpins.⁸

His proposal stalled, but that same legislation is moving through Congress again with new support, and it looks like there’s a real chance it could pass. The White House is a clear ally. President Obama has said many times that punishment for crack and powder cocaine should be the same, ⁹ and Biden is now Vice President and still an ardent advocate for getting rid of the disparity.

But there are foes of this plan. Others want to see the disparity reduced to 20-to-1 or 10-to-1, but not eliminated. As Bill Piper of the Drug Policy Alliance has said, that “would be like amending the Constitution’s three-fifths clause to make African-Americans fourth-fifths citizens or desegregating 60 percent of public establishments instead of all of them.”¹⁰ Members of Congress need to hear that there is strong support for a full elimination of the disparity, and that now’s the time to support such legislation.

We can take this opportunity to join the Sentencing Commission and countless other advocates in calling on Congress to change this unjust law. Please join us:

http://colorofchange.org/crack/?id=1829-173305

Thank You and Peace,

– James, Gabriel, William, Dani, and the rest of the ColorOfChange team
April 20th, 2009

Help support our work. ColorOfChange.org is powered by YOU–your energy and dollars. We take no money from lobbyists or corporations and our tiny staff ensures your contributions go a long way. You can contribute here:

https://secure.colorofchange.org/contribute/?id=1829-173305

References:

1. “1 in 100 U.S. Adults Behind Bars, New Study Says,” New York Times, 02-28-08
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/28/us/28cnd-prison.html

2. “Crack/Cocaine Sentencing Disparity,” Drug Policy Alliance
http://www.drugpolicy.org/drugwar/mandatorymin/crackpowder.cfm

3. “H.R. 265 - Drug Sentencing Reform and Cocaine Kingpin Trafficking Act of 2009″
http://maplight.org/map/us/bill/79139/default/history

4. “Annotated Bibliography: Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System,” Sentencing Project
http://tinyurl.com/d2f6tk

5. “Cocaine Price/Purity Analysis of STRIDE Data,” Drug Enforcement Agency
http://www.dea.gov/concern/cocaine_prices_purity.html

6. “FAQ About Crack,” Narconon
http://www.addictionca.com/FAQ-crack.htm

7.U.S. Sentencing Commission Report to the Congress: Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy, May 2007.
http://www.ussc.gov/r_congress/cocaine2007.pdf

8. “Senate Bill Will Fix Sentencing Disparity for Crack Cocaine Possession,” Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, 7-18-07
http://tinyurl.com/cp5gtu

9. “White House Civil Rights Agenda”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/civil_rights/

10. “Congress to Hold Historic Hearing Tuesday on Draconian 100-to-1 Crack/Powder Sentencing Disparity,” Drug Policy Alliance, 02-25-08
http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/pressroom/pr022508.cfm

Additional resources:

“Race and the Drug War,” Drug Policy Alliance
http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/race/

“Federal Crack Cocaine Sentencing,” The Sentencing Project
http://www.sentencingproject.org/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=573

In 1955, he helped lead the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Two years later, he and Martin Luther King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. In 1965, Rev. Lowery led the march from Selma to Montgomery. At Tuesday
’s inauguration he began the benediction with the opening lines of the Negro National Anthem, “Lift Every Voice and Sing.”

Complete text follows.

read more | digg story

Read the rest of this entry »

My fellow citizens:I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because we the people have remained faithful to the ideals of our forebears, and true to our founding documents.

So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted on Pan-African News Wire:

The excellent summary below, written by Saeed Shabazz and just published in the Final Call, about the current repression and brutality against our political prisoners is a very accurate and chilling picture. But there is a more positive counterpart to this story, as evidenced in the event on political prisoners the Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition(FMAJC) and Resistance in Brooklyn held this past Friday night, November 21st, at St. Mary’s Church in New York City.

The evening was one of education and solidarity with political prisoners, on the occasion of the publication of an important new book on political prisoners, Let Freedom Ring by Matt Meyer. Former political prisoners Chairman Fred Hampton, Jr. of POCC, San Francisco 8 defendant Francisco (Cisco) Torres, Tarik Haskins, former BPP and BLA member incarcerated and tortured during a 17 year imprisonment, and Pam Africa of MOVE were among the speakers.

read more | digg story

Every year since 1970, United American Indians of New England have organized the National Day of Mourning observance in Plymouth at noon on Thanksgiving Day. Every year, hundreds of Native people and our supporters from all four directions join us. Every year, including this year, Native people from throughout the Americas will speak the truth about our history and about current issues and struggles we are involved in.

United American  Indians of New England

read more | digg story

Institutionalized homophobia in American society is definitely a white monopoly.

…pitting one group of oppressed against another can only aid those in positions of wealth and power who benefit from divide-and-conquer tactics. For this reason, many prominent African American leaders, from Coretta Scott King to Al Sharpton, have taken an unequivocal stand in defense of gay marriage.

read more | digg story

The election of America’s first black president has triggered more than 200 hate-related incidents.

“To a lot of people, the idea of secession doesn’t seem so crazy anymore,” says Tuggle. “People are talking about how left out they feel, … and they feel that something strange and radical has taken over our country.”

Anyone remember whites fleeing their neighborhoods when n*ggas moved in next door and started integrating their schools?  Now here’s some “white flight” for real! - Wild Roots

read more | digg story

- Associated Press - Comedian Wanda Sykes says the passage of a same-sex marriage ban in California has led to her be more outspoken about being gay.

read more | digg story

The federal appeals court in Atlanta on Friday halted Troy Anthony Davis’ execution, the third time his life has been spared shortly before he was to be put to death.

read more | digg story